Home Carer Comparators (4)
Here are the Factor Level scores for the post of Janitor under North Lanarkshire Council's much criticised 2006/07 job evaluation scheme (JES).
Now I have to say I find it incredible that a Janitor came out with 295 points and the much higher grade of NLC 6 under NLC's 2006/07 JES?
Especially when you consider that Home Carers were awarded the much lower grade of NLC3 whereas under the previous Manual Worker JES Home Carers were on exactly the same MW5 grade as council Janitors.
Daphne Romney QC, who represented A4ES clients at the long-running Employment Tribunal, certainly thought Home Carers were shabbily treated in NLC, and the tribunal agreed because the Council's defence collapsed in a heap and brought about last year's equal pay settlement.
The big question is what's happening this time around with NLC''s latest JES review which was supposed to be completed before the end of December 2015?
I think the workforce should be told and I suggest a 'pow wow' with the trade unions in NLC to get to the bottom of what's going on.
Janitor
Home Carers and JES
Here are the scores awarded to Home Carers' jobs in North Lanarkshire under the Council's much criticised 2006/07 job evaluation scheme (JES).
- Working Environment (WE) - 1
- Physical Coordination (PC) - 2
- Physical Effort (PE) - 2
- Mental Skills (MS) - 1
- Concentration (CON) - 2
- Communications Skills (COMMS) - 1
- Dealing with Relationships (DWR) - 3
- Responsibility for Employees (EMP) - 1
- Responsibility for Services to Others (STO) - 2
- Responsibility for Financial Resources (FIN) - 1
- Responsibility for Physical and Information Resources (PIR) - 2
- Initiative and Independence (I and I) - 2
- Knowledge (KN) - 2
Now the total score awarded originally to NLC Home Carers was 248 points (remember Factor Levels are 'weighted') which resulted in a grade of only NLC 3 under the 2006/07 job evaluation scheme (JES).
But this JE assessment was completely torn to shreds by Daphne Romney QC, the indomitable barrister acting for A4ES clients at the long-running Employment Tribunal hearing in Glasgow, which caused the Council's defences to collapse.
In other words, NLC was forced to agree that the Home Carers scores and grades had been manipulated by senior management were not fit to be relied upon because they'd not accurately reflect the duties and responsibilities of the job
A highly significant point is that before the Council's new 2006/07 job evaluation scheme NLC Home Carers were previously on the same Manual Worker grade (MW5) or a higher grade than the following traditional male dominated jobs:
Gardener
Estates Maintenance Worker
Storeperson/Driver
Greenkeeper
Recycling Attendant
Gardener (3)
Gravedigger
Driver 2
Janitor
Gardener - NLC 4
Estates Maintenance Worker - NLC4
Storeperson/Driver - NLC 4
Greenkeeper - NLC5
Recycling Attendant - NLC 5
Gardener (3) - NLC 6
Gravedigger - NLC 6
Refuse Driver 2 - NLC 6
Janitor NLC - 6
As I've pointed out on the blog site before, if this were a game of 'Snakes and Ladders' all the women's jobs have anded on a downwards 'snake' while all the male jobs landed on an upwards 'ladder'.
Which is impossible, of course, without a 'hidden hand' at work and that's why North Lanarkshire's case crumbled and finally fell apart at the Glasgow Employment Tribunal.
Next I'm going to look at the scores awarded to some of the male comparators because these jobs are all being re-examined as part of the equal pay settlement with NLC - a JES review that was supposed to have been completed before the end of December 2015.
So watch this space and prepare to get really mad if you're a Home Carer in Labour-run North Lanarkshire Council.