Another Fine Mess
The latest example of one of our councils wasting large sums of public money - has been laid bare by Scotland's local government watchdog - the Accounts Commission.
Here's what the Accounts Commission have to say about a project designed to provide a heating sytem to 500 houses in Wick - beggars belief really.
"Highland Council failed to establish effective governance arrangements for innovative heat and power project"
"The Accounts Commission has considered a report on The Highland Council’s Caithness Heat and Power (CHaP) project, which was run by an arms-length community enterprise. In its findings the Commission says the lack of appropriate risk management and effective governance arrangements for the project was a corporate failure by the council. It also highlights aspects of
the performance of two senior officers in relation to governance.
The Highland Council established a not for profit company in 2004 to provide a heating system to 500 houses in Wick. The company failed to deliver its objectives and the project experienced technological and financial problems. The council’s total commitment to the project including provisions stands at around £13.8 million. It has spent around £10.5 million so far but because the project is still ongoing the full cost and any losses cannot be determined yet.
The Commission says that there were weaknesses in the council’s arrangements for oversight of the project. From the start there was a lack of appropriate risk management. The council did not monitor progress effectively and failed to ensure that appropriate control mechanisms were in place.
The Commission notes that the council has taken action to avoid a similar situation happening again. The structure of the council has also changed in recent years and there is now less emphasis on area-based decision making.
Chair of the Accounts Commission for Scotland John Baillie said: “The CHaP project was established as an innovative scheme to benefit the local community. Unfortunately the council’s arrangements for managing its interest in the project were not as good or as effective as they should have been. However, The Highland Council has been addressing the difficulties in governance and financial stewardship and has taken action to avoid a similar position
developing again.
“Many councils deliver projects and services through arms length bodies. The history of this project has important lessons for elected members and senior officers. Effective governance and risk management are always needed from the start to ensure best use of public money.”
Isn't it amazing that no one takes responsibility - when things like this happen.
No one steps up and takes the rap - despite all that public money that's gone down the drain - elected councillors and senior officials all try to pin the blame on someone else.
And these are the same people - of course - who said there was no money to spare for equal pay.
Here's what the Accounts Commission have to say about a project designed to provide a heating sytem to 500 houses in Wick - beggars belief really.
"Highland Council failed to establish effective governance arrangements for innovative heat and power project"
"The Accounts Commission has considered a report on The Highland Council’s Caithness Heat and Power (CHaP) project, which was run by an arms-length community enterprise. In its findings the Commission says the lack of appropriate risk management and effective governance arrangements for the project was a corporate failure by the council. It also highlights aspects of
the performance of two senior officers in relation to governance.
The Highland Council established a not for profit company in 2004 to provide a heating system to 500 houses in Wick. The company failed to deliver its objectives and the project experienced technological and financial problems. The council’s total commitment to the project including provisions stands at around £13.8 million. It has spent around £10.5 million so far but because the project is still ongoing the full cost and any losses cannot be determined yet.
The Commission says that there were weaknesses in the council’s arrangements for oversight of the project. From the start there was a lack of appropriate risk management. The council did not monitor progress effectively and failed to ensure that appropriate control mechanisms were in place.
The Commission notes that the council has taken action to avoid a similar situation happening again. The structure of the council has also changed in recent years and there is now less emphasis on area-based decision making.
Chair of the Accounts Commission for Scotland John Baillie said: “The CHaP project was established as an innovative scheme to benefit the local community. Unfortunately the council’s arrangements for managing its interest in the project were not as good or as effective as they should have been. However, The Highland Council has been addressing the difficulties in governance and financial stewardship and has taken action to avoid a similar position
developing again.
“Many councils deliver projects and services through arms length bodies. The history of this project has important lessons for elected members and senior officers. Effective governance and risk management are always needed from the start to ensure best use of public money.”
Isn't it amazing that no one takes responsibility - when things like this happen.
No one steps up and takes the rap - despite all that public money that's gone down the drain - elected councillors and senior officials all try to pin the blame on someone else.
And these are the same people - of course - who said there was no money to spare for equal pay.
