Sturgeon/Yousaf - Embarrassing, Politically Motivated Whitewash

Humza Yousaf's non-apology apology was given as the reason for Sturgeon dropping a formal enquiry under the Ministerial Code after the minister leaked information to the Daily Record.

"Presiding Officer, as I hope you will appreciate, it was never my intention to cause you or indeed this chamber any issues when speaking to the media ahead of my statement today.

"Let me offer an apology to you but also the chamber if issues were caused and my assurance, of course, that we will take the necessary steps to ensure that this does not happen again in the future."

Yousaf's words follow the same pattern of all non-apology apologies - the minister is not sorry for causing offence or 'issues', but only 'if' his behaviour broke long established and very well known parliamentary rules.

Yousaf also says it was never his 'intention' to leak details of parliamentary statement to the press, yet the circumstances surrounding the leak have never been made clear - because there has never been a proper investigation into what exactly happened.

The underlying problem is that the First Minister is both judge and jury when it comes to the behaviour of other ministers and in this case Sturgeon clearly did not want an investigation into the idiotic behaviour of her hapless health minister.

What the Scottish Parliament would benefit from is an independent investigation into complaints of serious misconduct by ministers - instead of this embarrassing, politically motivated whitewash.

  

Scotland's Ministerial Code - Not Fit For Purpose (September 22, 2021)

Who would have though the First Minister would move so quickly to absolve her hapless health minister, Humza Yousaf, of any responsibility for acting like a complete arse! 

Scotland's Ministerial Code is not fit for purpose while the First Minister remains judge and jury into how Scottish Ministers behave.

 

Scottish Ministers, Brass Necks and Social Media (September 22, 2021)

Humza Yousaf has just been given a well deserved dressing down for leaking details of a parliamentary statement to the Daily Record - and there's also a suggestion he's broken the Ministerial Code (of course he did - it's a slam dunk case).

But if Humza was smart he'd say the information was sent via Twitter because the First Minister is on record as saying she has no responsibility for her ministers behaviour on social media.  

 

Christina McKelvie - Well, Well, Well! (August 06, 2021)

 

Well, well, well - fancy that!

Seems like I've been blocked by Scotland's Minister for Older People & Equalities after criticising Christina McKelvie and complaining to the First Minister about her use of social media to misrepresent Scots law.

Christina McKelvie is a public servant and as a Scottish Minister she ought to be accessible to the public on social media, in my view.

The only acceptable reason for 'blocking' people on Twitter is if they are being really obnoxious or hateful - whereas my criticism of the Minister has to do with her misleading the public by making false and damaging statements that "TWAW".

Who knows where all this might lead, but it seems that while the SNP love to dish it out they react very badly when they're on the receiving end of criticism - even fair criticism!

Meanwhile Scotland's first minister looks the other way and says, with the boldest of brass necks, that it's nothing to do with her or the Scottish Government.

  

Scottish Ministers - Abusing Social Media (August 05, 2021)

So the First Minister's response to my complaint about Christina McKelvie is that her ministers can say whatever they like on social media - no matter how false, mendacious or misleading - so long as they use a personal rather than an official government account.

Now I fail to see what difference a personal account makes, particularly when the SNP are so fond of complaining about how others behave in public - I can't imagine a UK minister being let off the hook in this way, for example. 

In which case how can Scottish Ministers be given a 'get out of jail free card' when their comments relate directly to government policy and/or official business?

Christina McKelvie's Twitter public comments certainly fall into this category and, to my mind, there is no excuse for a highly paid public servant to be publicly campaigning in such an irresponsible, partisan manner on social media.

I am going to think carefully before deciding what to do next because this is about good government, integrity and leadership - qualities which are all noticeably missing from the First Minister's response. 

  

Scottish Ministers and Social Media (July 30, 2021)

I've written to the First Minister about the behaviour of one of her colleagues, Christina McKelvie, on Twitter.

Seems that Scottish Ministers can't have their cake and eat it at the same time - they must be held accountable for their behaviour on personal social media accounts.

Dear First Minister 

Scottish Government - Christina McKelvie, Minister for Older People and Equalities

I wish to make a formal complaint regarding the conduct of Christina McKelvie, the Scottish Government's Minister for Older People and Equalities, on social media. 

On 15 February 2021 Ms McKelvie published the following false public statement on Twitter:

"Sorry but TWAW (Trans Women Are Women) is actually the law so no false equivalence"

In my view, Ms McKelvie's conduct is a serious breach of the Scottish Government Ministerial Code for the following reasons.

Firstly, the Minister's tweet is completely untrue because the statement that 'Trans Women Are Women' does not, of course, represent the law in Scotland.  

Secondly, the Minister is straying into territory way beyond her own area of responsibility and the Minister ought to have checked her facts with senior Scottish Government law officers before making this untrue and highly misleading public statement.

I realise this statement was made from Christina McKelvie's personal Twitter account, but this simply highlights an obvious problem if individual ministers mistakenly think that they are free to say whatever they like on social media, without being held to account for their actions.

I disagree profoundly that Scottish Ministers can behave in this way and believe it is reasonable to expect a certain level of intelligence and sound judgment from highly paid individuals who ought to know better drawing, as they do, generous salaries worth over £100,000 a year from the public purse. 

In my view, the Ministerial Code applies at all times and Ministers cannot be allowed to simply sidestep the requirements of the code by ensuring that any inappropriate conduct or bad behaviour takes place via their personal Twitter accounts.  

I am happy to discuss my complaint further if you decide to refer this matter to the independent advisers on the Ministerial Code in which case I can be contacted on the following mobile phone number.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Kind regards

Mark Irvine