Council Baloney
The Sunday Herald sent me a the following comment from a South Lanarkshire Council 'spokesman' not all of which was used in putting together the piece yesterday entitled 'Equal pay row engulfs Labour council'.
"A Council spokesman said:
All Council employees are paid in accordance with their evaluated rate, regardless of gender. Last year an Employment Tribunal found that our scheme of job evaluation was not sex discriminatory. Mark Irvine’s analysis is inaccurate – it ignores additional aspects of pay which are included in employee’s salaries such as shift working and overtime.
We have given Mr Irvine the information that he requested through Freedom of Information. As we have previously noted, that information had already been shared with those who represent claimants through the employment tribunal some years ago. That is the correct place to debate this matter, not through a blog. "
I have to say that I'm surprised that South Lanarkshire Council has the gall to spout such nonsense - and I'm quite prepared to debate the issues publicly with the Council Leader, Eddie McAvoy, or the Council's Chief Executive, Lesley Freeland.
Because last year a Glasgow Employment Tribunal found that South Lanarkshire's 'in-house' job evaluation scheme does not comply with equal pay legislation (including the 1970 Equal Pay Act) and - as a result - that the scheme it is 'unfit for purpose'.
So the Council is in a very deep hole - and one entirely of its own making.
Also, the Council's comment about shift pay and overtime is patently absurd - because jobs are placed on the spinal column of pay points as a statement of what they are worth and where they stand in relation to one another - their comparative value in other words - and they are paid (or should be paid) at the relevant SCP rate for whatever hours are worked.
Yet the Council 'spokesman' would have people believe that it's some kind of industrial 'pick and mix' - where certain jobs can be paid at much higher salaries or rates of pay - and that all of these jobs just happen to be traditional male jobs.
Which sounds like a whole load of baloney - don't you think?.
What's become clear, as a result of the UK Supreme Court decision, is that South Lanarkshire Council has been treating male and female jobs very differently and the Council's suggestion that this is all perfectly innocent - is completely laughable
The Sunday Herald lays it on the line with this hard-hitting piece in today's newspaper about the secretive pay arrangements in South Lanarkshire Council - which are now unravelling on a daily basis.
We have given Mr Irvine the information that he requested through Freedom of Information. As we have previously noted, that information had already been shared with those who represent claimants through the employment tribunal some years ago. That is the correct place to debate this matter, not through a blog. "
I have to say that I'm surprised that South Lanarkshire Council has the gall to spout such nonsense - and I'm quite prepared to debate the issues publicly with the Council Leader, Eddie McAvoy, or the Council's Chief Executive, Lesley Freeland.
Because last year a Glasgow Employment Tribunal found that South Lanarkshire's 'in-house' job evaluation scheme does not comply with equal pay legislation (including the 1970 Equal Pay Act) and - as a result - that the scheme it is 'unfit for purpose'.
So the Council is in a very deep hole - and one entirely of its own making.
Also, the Council's comment about shift pay and overtime is patently absurd - because jobs are placed on the spinal column of pay points as a statement of what they are worth and where they stand in relation to one another - their comparative value in other words - and they are paid (or should be paid) at the relevant SCP rate for whatever hours are worked.
Yet the Council 'spokesman' would have people believe that it's some kind of industrial 'pick and mix' - where certain jobs can be paid at much higher salaries or rates of pay - and that all of these jobs just happen to be traditional male jobs.
Which sounds like a whole load of baloney - don't you think?.
What's become clear, as a result of the UK Supreme Court decision, is that South Lanarkshire Council has been treating male and female jobs very differently and the Council's suggestion that this is all perfectly innocent - is completely laughable
Because why else did South Lanarkshire not just publish the information instead of wasting £200,000 of public money trying to keep the details secret?
So, the blog site is exactly the kind of place to debate this matter - because without the A4ES blog site the whole issue of openness and transparency would never have been tested and upheld in the UK Supreme Court.
So, the blog site is exactly the kind of place to debate this matter - because without the A4ES blog site the whole issue of openness and transparency would never have been tested and upheld in the UK Supreme Court.
And that's what's really getting up South Lanarkshire Council's nose - if you ask me.
Secrets Unravelling (18 August 2013)
The Sunday Herald lays it on the line with this hard-hitting piece in today's newspaper about the secretive pay arrangements in South Lanarkshire Council - which are now unravelling on a daily basis.
I'll have more to say tomorrow, but I'm pleased to say that the 'McAvoy must go' campaign is gathering momentum - because I can't see how someone who has been Leader of the Council for the past 14 years can pass the buck to anyone else - for the terrible mess South Lanarkshire has landed itself in when it comes to equal pay.
No other council in Scotland has behaved in this way - but it has taken five judges in the UK Supreme Court (unanimously), three judges in Scotland's Court of Session (also unanimously) and the independent Scottish Information Commissioner - to hold this 'rogue' council to account.
Equal pay row engulfs Labour council
SECRET files unlocked by the UK's highest court prove a Labour-run council discriminated against its female staff by paying them less than men then tried to cover up its wrongdoing, it was claimed yesterday.
Labour's Eddie McAvoy, who has run South Lanarkshire Council since 1999, has faced calls to resign Photograph: Nick Ponty
It was claimed the documents suggest South Lanarkshire Council paid about 90% of a key group of male manual workers more than female counterparts assessed as having the same skill levels.
About 580 male gardeners and refuse collectors should have earned between £8.77 and £9.17 an hour at today's rates, the same as about 2000 female carers, cooks, classroom assistants and school clerical workers on the same job grade.
However, about 530 of the men were paid more than £9.17 an hour through unfair bonuses and secret pay deals, and about 400 were paid more than £10.07 an hour, according to campaigners.
South Lanarkshire, which has 4400 male staff and 10,400 female workers, now faces a multi-million-pound compensation bill from women who may have been illegally underpaid for years.
Labour's Eddie McAvoy, who has run the council since 1999, faces calls to resign.
The council is already being taken to a tribunal by 3000 female staff claiming more than £10 million in back pay, with a hearing due in October.
Its latest accounts admit many of these claims could be backdated up to five years from the date of the original grievance, and that if it loses a large number of the cases it faces a very substantial loss.
The SNP last night demanded "full disclosure" from McAvoy on the scale of the problem.
The figures have emerged from a long-running freedom of information (FoI) case launched in 2010 by equal pay campaigner, Mark Irvine.
In light of many other councils paying male staff more than female peers, and being forced to pay compensation, Irvine asked South Lanarkshire about male workers on the "LSO3" grade. In theory, women should have been paid the same as the men on LSO3, but in practice almost all of the men got more, the files indicate.
The council only released the data under FoI after losing an appeal to the UK Supreme Court last month.It had previously refused to release the figures when ordered to do so by the Scottish Information Commissioner and the Court of Session.
The Supreme Court appeal, the first by a Scottish public body in an FoI case, is likely to cost the council £200,000 in legal fees.
However, evidence of widespread and systematic unfair pay could cost it tens of millions more.
South Lanarkshire SNP councillor Peter Craig said: "There has now got to be full disclosure. There are huge sums of money at stake."
A South Lanarkshire Council spokesman said: "All council employees are paid in accordance with their evaluated rate, regardless of gender.
"Mark Irvine's analysis is inaccurate - it ignores additional aspects of pay which are included in employees' salaries, such as shift working and overtime."
