Glasgow's Fight For Equal Pay
Back in 2018 I responded point-by-point to a letter from Annemarie O'Donnell (AOD) to the Glasgow 'Council Family'.
I've decided to do this again given the latest breakdown in equal pay settlement negotiations.
AOD Letter
"I want to give you an update about the council's commitment to resolving equal pay claims."
MY COMMENT
I'VE BEEN STUNG INTO WRITING THIS LETTER BECAUSE MARK IRVINE MADE SUCH FUN OF THE COUNCIL ON HIS BLOG
"You may recall from previous communications that agreement was reached with all parties involved on how to settle equal pay claims up to 2018. Payments to claimants were made following approval of the funding at the City Administration Committee in February 2019."
IN 2019 THE COUNCIL ACCEPTED THE WPBR WAS 'UNFIT FOR PURPOSE' WHICH IS WHY IT PAID OUT £500 MILLION IN PARTIAL SETTLEMENT CLAIMS - WHAT'S CHANGED?
"Some claimants were also due payments towards pensions and the calculations and settlements for pensions are still ongoing due to the complexity of the process. I can assure you that this remains a priority for the council and the process is being worked on by council officers."
GCC HAS SCREWED UP YET AGAIN
"As you know we are in the process of implementing a new pay and grading scheme and until that scheme is implemented, we will continue to deal with the issue of equal pay claims."
A REPLACEMENT FOR THE UNFIT FOR PURPOSE WPBR WAS DUE TO BE IN PLACE BY APRIL 2021
"This involves negotiations between the council and claimants' representatives which includes our trade unions, on how to settle any new claims and the ongoing claims from 2018 and until a new scheme is in place."
"Senior council officers are now meeting claimants' representatives and trade unions fortnightly to agree how to settle new and outstanding claims."
THIS IS NONSENSE - THERE ARE NO NEGOTIATIONS TAKING PLACE
"We will continue to keep everyone updated on this matter including committee decisions required to approve the process and payments to claimants"
IF THE COUNCIL IS LEFT TO ITS OWN DEVICES THIS WILL BE ON THE TWELFTH OF NEVER!
Annemarie O'Donnell
Glasgow - Message for Annemarie (05/10/18)
Here's my point by point answer to Annemarie O'Donnell's email to equal pay claimants in Glasgow which concludes by asking:
"Why don't you show some real leadership for a change - by offering your resignation?"
Please read this along with my post from earlier today - 'Breaking News! - Glasgow Family Alert'
Subject: Industrial action by Unison and GMB
MESSAGE FROM ANNEMARIE O’DONNELL, CHIEF EXECUTIVE.
Dear Colleague,
Both Unison and GMB have written to me advising that they intend to take strike action on 23rd and 24th October.
I want to be clear that, if you are a member of either union and were balloted for industrial action, you have every right to withdraw your labour and I fully appreciate that your Trade Union is asking you to take part in a wholly legal strike. You also have every right to campaign for a fair settlement to equal pay and I understand why you would feel anger about this issue.
However, I am writing to ask those of you balloted for strike action to carefully consider your decision to go on strike and also its impact on the critical services you provide in your community.
The Council is committed to reaching a settlement on equal pay by negotiation. In January, the council and claimants agreed that this would take until at least December – and the Trade Unions signed up to that timescale on your behalf.
Contrary to what you have been told, good progress is being made.
The council was asked by Trade Union representatives to withdraw any further legal appeals and we did.
We were asked to abandon WPBR. We have not only done this, but a report recommending the adoption of the same Job Evaluation Scheme that most other Scottish councils use will go to committee next week. This is the scheme endorsed by your Trade Union representatives, who were fully involved in the evaluation of which scheme the council should use.
THE WPBR WAS ABANDONED BECAUSE IT WAS CONDEMNED AS 'UNFIT FOR PURPOSE. BY THE COURT OF SESSION, THE HIGHEST CIVIL COURT IN SCOTLAND. ACTION 4 EQUALITY SCOTLAND (A4ES) IS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS TO REPLACE THE JES AS WELL.
The Trade Unions asked for Cordia to be brought back into the Council and terms and conditions to be harmonised with Council terms. This happened last weekend.
Despite all of this, you are being told negotiation meetings are pointless and that the Council is not negotiating. This is simply untrue.
Considerable progress has also been made on the job evaluation element of negotiations and the claimants’ representatives acknowledge this.
We have also made significant progress on the methodology element – the way the value of eventual settlement is calculated. Again, the claimants’ representatives agree and have acknowledged that progress.
At the same time, the council has agreed to significantly increase the frequency of meetings so that we can push forward the work already underway to agree comparators – establishing an approach to overtime, to NSWP and the other important elements of the claim.
I need to say to you that strike action cannot have any influence on the settlement. It cannot change the timetable and it cannot change the outcome. All of this is happening. It is happening now and, following discussions with the claimants’ representatives this month and next, the council will make a settlement offer in December for further discussion with the claimants’ representatives.
I do not know why the Trade Unions have asked colleagues to go on strike or what objectives the Trade Union thinks can be achieved. I do not know what they think can be done to reach a settlement within the agreed timescale, other than what is already being done.
What I do know is the terrible effect of a strike.
If you work in Homecare you will know better than me what it means to our old people when we withdraw our services.
In the 48 hours over which your union is asking you to strike; you and your colleagues would normally carry out around at least 30,000 home care visits to more than 6,500 clients – more than 1,200 of whom are among the most vulnerable people in the city, including those receiving end-of-life care.
You would support around 160 people who, without our services, will be unable to leave hospital.
I want to be absolutely clear that there is almost nothing the Council can do to cover these services during a strike. Withdrawing labour does mean that the critical service provided is also withdrawn. Our clients are, I’m afraid, on their own.
If you work in Education, you will know that schools and early years establishments will close. You will know that parents and carers will struggle to make arrangements to look after their children. If you work in Facilities Management, you will know that your services will simply stop.
Strike or no strike there will be a settlement offer from the council in December; at least for all of those still at the table. To be clear, neither Unison nor the GMB will be at the table while industrial action continues.
Unison and the GMB will, no doubt, have reminded you of the power that you have in flexing your industrial might. On that, we agree.
Colleagues have been asked to bring some of the city’s most crucial services to a halt. I am asking them to choose not to.
Annemarie O’Donnell
Chief Executive