Glasgow - Can't Have It Both Ways

Annemarie O'Donnell has written another of her missives to the Glasgow 'Council Family'.

But the chief executive's sugar coated message has prompted Stefan Cross to respond and set the record straight - by pointing out that there are not just a 'couple' of last remaining issues to resolve.

So while the Council is urging the Claimants to 'cool the beans' with their public comments, the Council Side is holding itself to a very different standard it seems.

If you ask me, the Council can't have its cake and eat it at the same time - and that's what I suspect the Claimants will have to say at the next meeting on Tuesday.

   




UPDATE - JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS WRONG ANNE MARIE

AMOD has sent another missive to staff. Here:

Message from Annemarie O'Donnell, Chief Executive – equal pay negotiations update

You will recall in October that both the Leader and I intimated that as agreed in the negotiation timetable we wanted to be in a position to make individual settlement offers to claimants in December.

In the last six weeks both sides agree that our negotiations have been productive and we’ve made significant progress towards reaching a settlement. However, we need to have further talks on a couple of last remaining issues.

This is the most crucial phase of the process but as you will understand it also the most difficult and complex time and one that we must collectively work on to bring this situation to its conclusion.

It has therefore been decided by both sides that we will continue to work on these issues, with a view to finishing these talks in the early part of the New Year.

As always I will continue to provide updates as we have them.

In the meantime if you have any questions or suggestions please email me here.

Most of this is correct. Except. Isn’t there always an ‘except’. Except the suggestion there are only ‘a couple’ of last remaining issues.

Goodness I wish this were true (so do all of our bank managers)

Sadly there are rather more than 2 outstanding issues. I will point this out to them on Tuesday. If they let me, I’ll report back next week

Stefan

Glasgow: Just Imagine - Radio Silence (15/12/18)

So it seems that some folks in the City Council would like to put Stefan Cross on the 'naughty step' for keeping Glasgow's equal pay Claimants informed about what has been happening during marathon settlement talks which have been dragging on for almost 12 months now.  

Just imagine what things would look like if the Council got its way - virtual 'radio silence' from December 2017 onwards with thousands of claimants being kept in the dark, unless a joint statement had been issued, subject to agreement with Council officials and elected politicians, of course.

I wonder how the SNP Group would have reacted, if a previous Labour-run council made a similar proposal? 

The reality is that Stefan's regular updates have ensured that the Claimants know what's going on without breaking the confidentiality of the negotiating process which really got underway in earnest only six weeks ago or so, of course.

For months the Council moved at the speed of a glacier and then tried to break off negotiations altogether in the summer - a deliberate provocation which led to the GMB and Unison strike ballots along with the Employment Tribunal process starting up again.   

Meanwhile Glasgow's chief executive, Annemarie O'Donnell, felt free to continue with her one-sided portrayal of events through a series of regular emails to the 'Council Family' - yet senior officials and politicians have the gall to complain about Stefan Cross keeping the Claimants properly informed.

But I'm sure Stefan won't allow himself to be 'gagged' - it didn't happen under the last Labour-run council and I've no doubt 'radio silence' won't be observed under an SNP-led council either.

Sure, there's a time and place for both sides in sensitive  negotiations to cool the beans with their public comments, but that has to be balanced with the Claimants' right to know what is going on.

Whatever happens there is no going back to 2005 when all of this was decided behind closed doors - in what was an affront to democracy and good local government.  
   
   

I’VE SAID TOO MUCH, APPARENTLY 

So there were no meetings with the council this week. I’m told the council were very pee’d off with my last two posts. They think I didn’t keep to an agreement not to slag off SusanA. I disagree. I don’t criticise her for not reaching agreement by Xmas. In fact I think extending the negotiations was sensible and said so. Seems I can’t win. The council think I say too much and some of you think I say too little. 

😢😢😢

So the council Now want a complete ban on me saying anything - except it’s all going brilliantly (which isn’t entirely true). 

But we haven’t agreed that, yet. 

So this might be my last permitted post. Or the council might walk away from negotiations because they don’t like my posts. Hopefully they won’t be that silly. 

Anyway, away from the numbers we have to deal with the terms of any settlement, assuming we can get agreement on money. These include a memorandum of understanding (the agreement between the council and the negotiating team ) and the proposed settlement agreement- which each claimant would have to sign. We have literally been requesting these for a year now and we’ve still received nothing. We even sent them a draft settlement agreement nine months ago to which they have not responded. 

Yet again, enough is enough. Time for them to deliver. (I wonder how many times I’m going to have to say that).

In the meantime, the claimant Group meetings have taken place and they have been incredibly useful and productive. And the ongoing work by Karl Bromley is just phenomenal. 

The council have kindly agreed to talk to us again with meeting listed to start again Tuesday. Let’s hope we can clear the air in a kind and respectful manner and get back down to business. It would be nice to have a peaceful Xmas. 

Just a reminder, if it doesn’t go well, we are back in tribunal 20-22nd February and remedies are now listed for 23rd to 30th April. 

We are also sorting out test claimants for the Equal Value Process which has also just started. The various claimant teams will be contacting people in the next few days and weeks. 

So we are using the gaps in meetings productively and to your benefit.

I’m now going to shut up. 

Stefan Cross