I was not surprised to read this interview in The Herald in which the outgoing chief executive of COSLA, Rory Mair, failed to say a single word about equal pay, one of the major issues facing Scottish local government during Rory's time in office.
COSLA is the self-styled 'voice' of local government, but sadly the Convention rather lost its voice and had little to say about the council employers in Scotland failing to stand up for their lowest paid staff over the 1999 Single Status Agreement.
A landmark equal pay agreement which promised to sweep away years of pay discrimination and deliver a new deal for a largely female council workforce - carers, cleaners, catering staff, clerical workers and classrooms assistants.
Yet is failed to happen under Rory's watch and during that period COSLA's stock has, arguably, fallen to an all-time low which may be coincidence, though then again maybe not.
Outgoing chief of councils umbrella group Cosla Rory Mair warns pulling services away from local control will hit poorest hardest
Middle classes sheltered from ravages of local cuts as councils' chief warns of impact on poor of 'crude' government policies
By Gerry Braiden - The Herald
SCOTLAND'S middle classes remain sheltered from the worst effects of council cuts with the less well-off to suffer if more public services are delivered nationally, local government's most senior official has warned.
Rory Mair, the outgoing chief executive of councils' umbrella group Cosla, said people relying on social care had been hammered by the continuing financial pressures facing local authorities while the "fairly well off in this country might not have noticed".
In an extensive interview on the eve of his departure he attacked the Scottish Government's focus on teacher and police numbers and hospital waiting times, claiming there was a danger vital services like health and education were being defined by "very very crude input measures" instead of their value to society.
Sunshine of Socialism (11/11/15)
I didn't hear Kezia Dugdale deliver her leader's speech to the Scottish Labour conference at the weekend, but I read what she had to say later (see link below) and the following two sections stood out for me like a sore thumb.
"I want to thank our brothers and sisters in the union movement for standing by us, in good times and bad. Your values are our values. We are, and always will be, the party of working people, a proud party of trade unionists."
"In Scotland nearly 350,000 families rely on the money from tax credits. The average family will be more than £100 a month worse off as a result of these changes. 70% of the money saved by this tax rise on working people will come from the pockets of working mothers."
Now back in the year 2000 when the Scottish Government was Labour-led, Jack McConnell (then education minister) signed-off on a new pay deal for Scotland's teachers (the McCrone Agreement) at a cost of £800 million a year.
The McCrone Agreement was fully funded which meant that no specific productivity gains were demanded from the teaching workforce in return for a 23.5% increase in pay in a single year; the agreement having been struck by a triumvirate comprising the Scottish Government, Labour-led COSLA and the teaching trade unions.
A year earlier, the big three public sector trade unions (Unison, GMB and Unite) along with the council employers reached what was hailed at the time as a landmark agreement on equal pay - the 1999 Single Status Agreement which promised a 'new deal' for tens of thousands of low paid women's jobs: carers, cleaners, classroom assistants, clerical and catering workers.
But unlike the McCrone Agreement the 1999 Single Status Agreement was not fully funded and in the years that followed the council employers and the trade unions simply allowed the landmark deal to wither on the vine, even though in the 10 year period between 1997 to 2007 the budgets of councils in Scotland virtually doubled.
What happened, in effect, was that the interests of 70,000 teachers were given a much higher priority than those of over 100,000 of the lowest paid workers in Scottish local government, the great irony being that thew two groups are both council workers and employed by Scotland's 32 local councils.
The cost of implementing the 1999 Single Status Agreement, in full, was put at £450 million a year compared to the £800 million price tag attached to the teachers' McCrone Agreement and the added advantage of the Single Status Agreement was that it would have ended low pay in Scottish local government by raising the lowest hourly rate of pay towards £9.00 an hour - thereby eliminating the need for working family tax credits.
The cost to low paid council workers of not implementing 1999 Agreement amounted to thousands of pounds a year for full-time workers, i.e. much more than the £100 a month refereed to by Kecia Dugdale in the section of her speech about tax credits.
The 'rainbow coalition' collectively responsible for this historic failure to tackle low pay were the Labour-led Scottish Government of the day, Labour-led COSLA, the big Labour-led councils (in Glasgow and Lanarkshire for example), and the Labour-supporting trade unions who failed to stand up for their lowest paid members when the chips were down.
So if that's what's meant by the 'sunshine of socialism', my name's Jeremy Corbyn.
Empty Words (31/10/15)
"To me, socialism is simple. It’s about everyone caring for everyone else.
"This is a kinder, more caring politics … we don’t compete, we co-operate.
"But it is a politics fired by our passion for fighting injustice, in our belief that an injury to one is an injury to all … the concept of solidarity."
Now I don't remember Jeremy, or the kind of people who share his politics, having anything of significance to say during the fight for equalpauy that has been raging in Scotland over the past 10 years.
In fact, some of the worst offenders have been the big Labour councils who presided over pay arrangements that discriminated against female dominated jobs: carers, classroom assistants, cleaners, clerical and catering workers.
Not only that, of course, because the Labour-supporting trade unions were often in cahoots with the employers and in some cases actively discouraged their members from pursuing claims for equal pay.
Socialist, my arse.