Who Crashed the Bus? (3)
More readers' comments on my 'Who Crashed the Bus?' post on the role of senior officials in Glasgow over the City Council's unfit for purpose WPBR pay scheme.
Sacked and kicked out of office, these people have had over 10 years to sort this, are these people really doing things in the best interest of their employees, NO, I'm of the opinion, remove theses jokers.
L
Time to move on GCC
C
F
J
R
I plan to publish the salaries paid to Glasgow's senior officials so that readers can decide for themselves whether the council's behaviour is akin to 'rewarding failure'.
Glasgow - Who Crashed the Bus? 2 (18/03/18)
Yet the workforce and the wider public are being asked to believe that the same group of senior officials who invited Hays HR Consulting to design the WPBR and who went on to approve the WPBR's introduction in 2007 are now capable of protecting the interests of predominantly female jobs in 2018.
In my view this is a near impossible task - the new Council leadership insisted on a reviewing of its governance and decision making by bringing in some independent expertise from the Improvement Service.
Yet when it comes to delivering equal pay the same group of officials who helped 'pull the wool over the eyes' of their lowest paid employees are being entrusted with the enormous responsibility of putting things right.
Now this doesn't make sense if you ask me and unless things change for the better very soon, I expect that the settlement negotiations will slowly grind to a halt in the weeks ahead.
The reality is that officials are driving the process and are getting away with 'murder' which, as people now understand, has been the case for many years.
Susan Aiken take note x
In response to criticism from the GMB union at the Scottish Labour Party conference, Frank was quick to point the finger of blame elsewhere by saying:
And when they get things wrong, as they have done in spectacular fashion over equal pay, things just can't continue as normal - someone has to pay the price for such terrible failure.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard has called for Glasgow's equal pay claimants to be given an apology which would be a good start.
But the truth is that senior officials are still defending their actions instead of putting their hands up and accepting they were completely wrong over their WPBR pay arrangments which have been condemned as 'unfit for purpose' by the Court of Session, Scotland's highest civil court.
So the best thing that could happen if you ask me, is that some of this arrogant crew should be encouraged to leave - or be shown the door.
By Stewart Paterson @PatersonHT - Evening Times
Equal pay protest in Glasgow
WOMEN in Glasgow were robbed of millions of hours through a failure of the council to provide equal pay, a union leader has said.
At a fringe meeting at the Labour Scottish Conference the party was criticised by unions for failing women for decades in the equal pay dispute.
Hazel Nolan, of GMB Scotland, said women workers were going to work every day and were being discriminated against every day.
She said: “That was under a Labour administration.”
Ms Nolan said the potential bill for settling claims could be as much as £500m.
She said: “That equates to 16million hours.
“That’s hours they will never get back. Some have passed away, that is hours with their family they will never have.”
Hayley Johnson of solicitors, Thomson’s, who have been dealing with many cases said it was allowed to happen because work done by women was not given the same value as men.
She said: “Roles that were predominantly seen as women’s work were undervalued. Carers were valued less than road workers or gardeners.
“Part time not seen as valuable as full time and 76% of part time workers are women.”
The lawyer said secrecy over people’s pay and conditions across employment sectors had to change.
She said: “For too long it has been cloak and dagger over what people are paid. It is not transparent.”
The end of a decade long battle that has seen the council defeated in the courts is in sight.
The SNP administration at Glasgow City Council announced last month it was abandoning the years of fighting the equal pay claims through the courts and was moving to settlement of claims through negotiation.
It decided not to seek leave to appeal to the UK Supreme Court, the final avenue open to the council to challenge a previous decision it should settle.
Council leader, Susan Aitken said the council would be moving ‘from litigation to negotiation’.
No figure has been put on what the final bill could be and £500m has been mentioned as the potential total for all claims.
However not all cases may be settled and amounts received in compensation have yet to be agreed and the final bill is likely to be less, but still in the hundreds of millions.
How any final sum will be funded from limited council funds has not been stated
Labour politicians have defended their previous actions on the equal pay dispute stating that it had paid out
Frank McAveety, former Leader of the council has said previously Labour spent £600m over the last ten years, to address historic inequalities in the council workforce.
And he added that all advice was form council legal officers and QC advice.
Officials form the council and lawyers and union representatives acting for the claimants are meeting to discuss progress towards agreeing settlements.
A spokesman for Glasgow City Council said: “The council and the claimants’ representatives are now meeting regularly and we have agreed a schedule of meeting for the rest of this calendar year.”
I plan to publish the salaries paid to Glasgow's senior officials so that readers can decide for themselves whether the council's behaviour is akin to 'rewarding failure'.
Glasgow - Who Crashed the Bus? 2 (18/03/18)
I detect a growing sense frustration amongst Glasgow's equal pay claimants as the settlement negotiations with the City Council approach a 4th month without a single issue of real substance being agreed.
More than 6 months after the Court of Session, Scotland's highest civil court, condemned Glasgow's WPBR pay scheme as 'unfit for purpose' senior officials are still 'digging in' by refusing to accept that the 'rules' of the were deliberately designed to disadvantage predominantly female jobs.
Elected councillors are strangely reluctant to engage on the issues and have little if any working knowledge of the way in which the various elements of the WPBR (Job Evaluation, WCD and NSWP) all actively work against the interests of the claimants' jobs.
Yet the workforce and the wider public are being asked to believe that the same group of senior officials who invited Hays HR Consulting to design the WPBR and who went on to approve the WPBR's introduction in 2007 are now capable of protecting the interests of predominantly female jobs in 2018.
In my view this is a near impossible task - the new Council leadership insisted on a reviewing of its governance and decision making by bringing in some independent expertise from the Improvement Service.
Yet when it comes to delivering equal pay the same group of officials who helped 'pull the wool over the eyes' of their lowest paid employees are being entrusted with the enormous responsibility of putting things right.
Now this doesn't make sense if you ask me and unless things change for the better very soon, I expect that the settlement negotiations will slowly grind to a halt in the weeks ahead.
The reality is that officials are driving the process and are getting away with 'murder' which, as people now understand, has been the case for many years.
Yip. Show them the door. And not with golden handshakes. Boot them out. Just like they did with us,we were booted out for doing our jobs, KARMA
💪
💪
M
Susan Aiken take note x
J
How is it possible that highly paid council officials who duped us into accepting just £9,000 as compensation for years of pay discrimination are still in charge of the settlement process?
K
Glasgow - Who Crashed the Bus? (14/03/18)
My reading of this article from the Evening Times is that Frank McAveety, the former Labour leader of Glasgow City Council, is preparing to throw senior council officials 'under the bus', as they say.
In response to criticism from the GMB union at the Scottish Labour Party conference, Frank was quick to point the finger of blame elsewhere by saying:
"And he added that all advice was form council legal officers and QC advice."
Which is fair enough because the small group of senior officials who run the show at Glasgow City Council are paid really high salaries to get things right - the best part of a million pounds a year for their 'expertise' and professional advice.
And when they get things wrong, as they have done in spectacular fashion over equal pay, things just can't continue as normal - someone has to pay the price for such terrible failure.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard has called for Glasgow's equal pay claimants to be given an apology which would be a good start.
But the truth is that senior officials are still defending their actions instead of putting their hands up and accepting they were completely wrong over their WPBR pay arrangments which have been condemned as 'unfit for purpose' by the Court of Session, Scotland's highest civil court.
So the best thing that could happen if you ask me, is that some of this arrogant crew should be encouraged to leave - or be shown the door.
If not, the reality is that the City Council is rewarding failure by leaving the same group of senior officials in charge who were responsible for 'crashing the bus' in the first place.
Women in Glasgow 'robbed of millions of hours' through council's equal pay failure
By Stewart Paterson @PatersonHT - Evening Times
Equal pay protest in Glasgow
WOMEN in Glasgow were robbed of millions of hours through a failure of the council to provide equal pay, a union leader has said.
At a fringe meeting at the Labour Scottish Conference the party was criticised by unions for failing women for decades in the equal pay dispute.
Hazel Nolan, of GMB Scotland, said women workers were going to work every day and were being discriminated against every day.
She said: “That was under a Labour administration.”
Ms Nolan said the potential bill for settling claims could be as much as £500m.
She said: “That equates to 16million hours.
“That’s hours they will never get back. Some have passed away, that is hours with their family they will never have.”
Hayley Johnson of solicitors, Thomson’s, who have been dealing with many cases said it was allowed to happen because work done by women was not given the same value as men.
She said: “Roles that were predominantly seen as women’s work were undervalued. Carers were valued less than road workers or gardeners.
“Part time not seen as valuable as full time and 76% of part time workers are women.”
The lawyer said secrecy over people’s pay and conditions across employment sectors had to change.
She said: “For too long it has been cloak and dagger over what people are paid. It is not transparent.”
The end of a decade long battle that has seen the council defeated in the courts is in sight.
The SNP administration at Glasgow City Council announced last month it was abandoning the years of fighting the equal pay claims through the courts and was moving to settlement of claims through negotiation.
It decided not to seek leave to appeal to the UK Supreme Court, the final avenue open to the council to challenge a previous decision it should settle.
Council leader, Susan Aitken said the council would be moving ‘from litigation to negotiation’.
No figure has been put on what the final bill could be and £500m has been mentioned as the potential total for all claims.
However not all cases may be settled and amounts received in compensation have yet to be agreed and the final bill is likely to be less, but still in the hundreds of millions.
How any final sum will be funded from limited council funds has not been stated
Labour politicians have defended their previous actions on the equal pay dispute stating that it had paid out
Frank McAveety, former Leader of the council has said previously Labour spent £600m over the last ten years, to address historic inequalities in the council workforce.
And he added that all advice was form council legal officers and QC advice.
Officials form the council and lawyers and union representatives acting for the claimants are meeting to discuss progress towards agreeing settlements.
A spokesman for Glasgow City Council said: “The council and the claimants’ representatives are now meeting regularly and we have agreed a schedule of meeting for the rest of this calendar year.”
