Project Fear Unravelling


The Better Together campaign, or Project Fear as its become known, is beginning to unravel if this article by John Curtice from Scotland on Sunday is anything to go by.

The polls certainly seem to be narrowing and I would say that people are really turned off by all the negative propaganda suggesting that Scotland would turn into some kind of banana republic if the country votes for independence on 18 September 2014. 

The No campaign seems to have lost its way and while its leaders try to distance themselves from David Cameron, I thought the Prime Minister hit the right note when he visited Edinburgh last year and acknowledged that of course Scotland could stand on its own two feet and become an independent country.

David Cameron's message was upbeat as he put his case that the UK was greater than just the sum of its parts and I have some sympathy with that point of view, which is why I thought the referendum should have a second question on greater powers for the Scottish Parliament.

Yet the people were denied that choice and so it's come down to a straight Yes or No between the status quo or independence - and increasingly I'm leaning towards the latter because I think the Westminster Parliament is a busted flush.

So I think John Curtice is right when he says that the 'naysayers' and 'doom merchants' have been firing at the wrong target.  

John Curtice: No’s doom and gloom misses target

Better Together leader Alistair Darling. Picture: Ian Georgeson

By John Curtice

THE No side is beginning to look like a campaign in trouble. In recent weeks, it has seized on many a company’s reservations about independence together with the latest figures on Scotland’s finances to warn us that leaving the UK would be bad for the nation’s economy.

All three unionist parties have made or renewed promises that in the event of a No vote the Scottish Parliament would be given more powers.

Meanwhile, Labour has been making a concerted effort to convince us that the Union offers the brighter hope for a fairer, more equal society.

Unfortunately for Alistair Darling and his team, none of these messages is getting through. Since our last poll four weeks ago, the proportion who think independence would be good for Scotland’s economy has increased by three points to 38 per cent. The proportion who think it would be bad is down three points to 43 per cent.

Pessimists now outnumber optimists by just five points. Last September the figure was 17 points.

The warnings from and about business are evidently either being ignored or disbelieved.

Voters are becoming increasingly convinced that an independent Scotland would be a more equal country. No less than 36 per cent are now of that view, up three points on February and no less than nine as compared with last September. Even those who voted Labour in 2011 are slightly more likely to think there would be less (27 per cent) than more inequality (22 per cent).

Meanwhile, although a quarter of voters fear pensions would be lower as a result of independence, the figure is no higher now than it was seven months ago.

Labour’s vision of the UK as a ‘sharing Union’ is evidently not one that comes readily to most voters’ minds.

Promises of more devolution have been thick in the air in the last fortnight. The former Labour Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, made a rare major speech on the subject, his Conservative successor, David Cameron, renewed his backing for the idea, while the final report of Labour’s Devolution Commission was published last Tuesday.

No less than 68 per cent of Scots agree that, in the event of a No vote, the Scottish Parliament should become primarily responsible for taxation and welfare. But just 39 per cent think Holyrood will actually be given more powers and responsibilities should Scotland vote No.

Even among those who want more powers, only just over two in five (42 per cent) believe the promises of more powers will be delivered. It is here perhaps that the unionists’ credibility gap is at its most striking.

The one piece of good news for the No side is that the vast and indeed incr­easing majority of No voters (81 per cent) are resolved to vote No even if by Septem­ber they were to be convinced more dev­ol­ution was not going to happen.

Even so, 10 per cent say they would switch to the Yes side, while another 10 per cent are not sure what they would do. Small though they might seem, these numbers could still be enough to tip the balance.

If all of the first group were to switch sides, together with half of the second, then bearing in mind, too, the inclination of more undecided voters to back Yes than to vote No, that would be sufficient to turn the referendum race into a virtual dead heat.

The lessons for the No side are clear. Frightening voters with messages of economic doom and gloom is not working.

• John Curtice is professor of politics at Strathclyde University

Popular posts from this blog

Kentucky Fried Seagull

Can Anyone Be A Woman?