Giz A Job!
The Sunday Herald ran a rather embarrassing story about the Scottish TUC recently with a report that its general secretary Grahame Smith, who has had very little to say about the fight for equal pay in Scotland over the past 12 years, has enough time on his hands to hold down not one, not two - but three extra jobs.
Now I don't know if Grahame is having three Weetabix every day for breakfast, but who cares because it's a terrible look for Scotland's trade union movement.
So the time has come to 'Step aside, brother' - if you ask me.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16599644.stuc-general-secretary-in-row-over-extra-three-jobs-on-top-of-union-role/
STUC general secretary in row over extra three jobs on top of union role
By Paul Hutcheon The Sunday Herald
SCOTLAND’s most senior trade union figure is topping up his salary with three paid posts in the public sector.
Grahame Smith, whose salary package at the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) is believed to be close to £70,000, earns extra on account of sitting on Government-linked boards.
He took on one of the jobs after the organisation’s then vice-president backed a campaign calling on male trade unionists to stop occupying multiple positions.
Smith became STUC general secretary in 2006 and leads a body that acts as the voice for hundreds of thousands of trade unionists. Over the decades, the STUC has been at the forefront of campaigns for equality, redistribution and social justice.
However, a senior union figure told this newspaper there is unhappiness over the additional roles Smith has accepted on top of his day job. Smith has numerous unpaid positions, such as serving as chairperson of Scotland Europa, but he has also agreed to various remunerated roles.
Sitting on the board of Skills Development Scotland (SDS), a quango, the Strathclyde University graduate is entitled to another £6,240 a year for two days a month. He can also claim a daily rate of up to £250, plus appropriate expenses, for time devoted to duties associated with membership of the Enterprise and Skills Strategic Board.
In July, Smith was appointed by Cabinet Secretary John Swinney to the board of the Scottish Qualifications Authority, which pays him £4,739 a year for 23 days per annum.
Months earlier, Public and Commercial Services Union national officer Lynn Henderson, who at that point was also vice-president of the STUC, issued a “step aside, brother” call to male trade unionists.
In an article on International Women’s Day, she wrote: “Are you a man occupying multiple union positions? Are you a man that has held leading officer posts for years? Are you a man who is a regular union conference delegate?
“Are you a man who is always first to sign up to a union activity? Hand up first to speak at meetings, Brother? Yes? Then I am asking you to Step Aside, Brother.”
She called on males to ask themselves: “Is it really necessary or in the best interest of our movement that I hold all these offices? Is there, perhaps, by stepping aside from just one of my positions, I can create space for and bring on someone on?”
Henderson, who is now STUC president, added: “Step Aside, Brother does not seek to subvert union democracy, undermine political leadership or ‘take out’ individuals.
“Step Aside Brother is a big ask to men in our movement to make an individual and conscious act to grow the movement for the future.” Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells said: “Perhaps the STUC president needs to start her campaign right at the top of the organisation.”
An STUC spokesperson said: “All members of public bodies are appointed in a personal capacity by Scottish ministers, following a transparent public appointments process and in line with the Scottish Government’s requirements for gender balance on public bodies.”
Many years ago Scottish TUC was an influential campaigning body which played a big role in industrial disputes and on wider public issues such as devolution and the creation of a Scottish Parliament.
Nowadays the STUC is a mere shadow of its former-self and its voice has hardly been heard on some of the biggest issues of the day - the long fight for equal pay, for example, or the threat too Scotland's economy posed by Brexit.
The Sunday Herald carried a very interesting story the other day which might help explain why - the STUC relies on the Scottish Government for the majority of its funding.
Incredible if you ask me, because Scotland's once proud trade union movement cannot claim to be properly independent of the government of the day, regardless of its political colour, if the STUC is constantly looking over its shoulder to check who's paying its bills.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16599647.stuc-in-firing-line-over-relying-on-snp-government-for-60-of-funding/
STUC in firing line over "relying" on SNP Government for 60% of funding
SCOTLAND’s most senior trade union figure is topping up his salary with three paid posts in the public sector.
Grahame Smith, whose salary package at the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) is believed to be close to £70,000, earns extra on account of sitting on Government-linked boards.
He took on one of the jobs after the organisation’s then vice-president backed a campaign calling on male trade unionists to stop occupying multiple positions.
Smith became STUC general secretary in 2006 and leads a body that acts as the voice for hundreds of thousands of trade unionists. Over the decades, the STUC has been at the forefront of campaigns for equality, redistribution and social justice.
However, a senior union figure told this newspaper there is unhappiness over the additional roles Smith has accepted on top of his day job. Smith has numerous unpaid positions, such as serving as chairperson of Scotland Europa, but he has also agreed to various remunerated roles.
Sitting on the board of Skills Development Scotland (SDS), a quango, the Strathclyde University graduate is entitled to another £6,240 a year for two days a month. He can also claim a daily rate of up to £250, plus appropriate expenses, for time devoted to duties associated with membership of the Enterprise and Skills Strategic Board.
In July, Smith was appointed by Cabinet Secretary John Swinney to the board of the Scottish Qualifications Authority, which pays him £4,739 a year for 23 days per annum.
Months earlier, Public and Commercial Services Union national officer Lynn Henderson, who at that point was also vice-president of the STUC, issued a “step aside, brother” call to male trade unionists.
In an article on International Women’s Day, she wrote: “Are you a man occupying multiple union positions? Are you a man that has held leading officer posts for years? Are you a man who is a regular union conference delegate?
“Are you a man who is always first to sign up to a union activity? Hand up first to speak at meetings, Brother? Yes? Then I am asking you to Step Aside, Brother.”
She called on males to ask themselves: “Is it really necessary or in the best interest of our movement that I hold all these offices? Is there, perhaps, by stepping aside from just one of my positions, I can create space for and bring on someone on?”
Henderson, who is now STUC president, added: “Step Aside, Brother does not seek to subvert union democracy, undermine political leadership or ‘take out’ individuals.
“Step Aside Brother is a big ask to men in our movement to make an individual and conscious act to grow the movement for the future.” Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells said: “Perhaps the STUC president needs to start her campaign right at the top of the organisation.”
An STUC spokesperson said: “All members of public bodies are appointed in a personal capacity by Scottish ministers, following a transparent public appointments process and in line with the Scottish Government’s requirements for gender balance on public bodies.”
STUC - Get Off Your Knees! (28/08/18)
Many years ago Scottish TUC was an influential campaigning body which played a big role in industrial disputes and on wider public issues such as devolution and the creation of a Scottish Parliament.
Nowadays the STUC is a mere shadow of its former-self and its voice has hardly been heard on some of the biggest issues of the day - the long fight for equal pay, for example, or the threat too Scotland's economy posed by Brexit.
The Sunday Herald carried a very interesting story the other day which might help explain why - the STUC relies on the Scottish Government for the majority of its funding.
Incredible if you ask me, because Scotland's once proud trade union movement cannot claim to be properly independent of the government of the day, regardless of its political colour, if the STUC is constantly looking over its shoulder to check who's paying its bills.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16599647.stuc-in-firing-line-over-relying-on-snp-government-for-60-of-funding/
STUC in firing line over "relying" on SNP Government for 60% of funding
By Paul Hutcheon -The Sunday Herald
SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon speaks at the STUC conference in Aviemore. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Monday April 24, 2017. Ms Sturgeon cast the general election as a straight fight between her own party and the Conservatives north of the border
THE Scottish Trades Union Congress is facing questions about its independence after the scale of its reliance on SNP Government funding was revealed.
Leaked documents show that the STUC, which speaks for nearly 500,000 workers, received around 60 per cent of its income from Nicola Sturgeon’s Government last year.
The £2.6 million in public funding far exceeds the sum paid to the STUC in fees from its own members.
Meanwhile, the GMB union, one of the umbrella group’s biggest members, said in a statement that they had raised concerns about “transparency and accountability in the running of the STUC”.
Founded in 1897, the Glasgow-based STUC acts as the voice of the trade union movement and lobbies Government for policy changes. It represents the interests of members in 39 unions and 20 trades union councils, and is financed by affiliation fees.
Although the STUC is not aligned to a political party, the body had a high-profile role promoting devolution in the 1980s and 1990s.
However, senior trade union figures told this newspaper that the STUC, led by general secretary Grahame Smith, was too reliant on the Scottish Government and had lost its way.
The STUC is now facing questions about its relationship with the Government and the financial model on which the organisation is based.
Unlike the TUC – its UK sister organisation – the STUC is under no obligation to make its annual financial statements available outwith affiliated unions.
A spin-off firm, STUC Training Ltd, publishes accounts, but a detailed picture of the income of the body is not in the public domain.
According to documents presented to the annual congress in Aviemore this year, the STUC and its training arm had a combined income of around £4.3m in 2017. Of this sum, less than 25 per cent came in the form of affiliation fees from trade unionists.
The biggest chunk of cash, £2.3m, was given to STUC Training Ltd by the SNP Government for the “Scottish Union Learning” initiative, which promotes skills and lifelong learning. Funds through the scheme are provided to the STUC, which distributes resources for different projects to help union members.
Another budget line also shows that the STUC received £324,440 from the Government for the “Union Modernisation Fund”.
This new pot was announced by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon as a way of mitigating what she described as Tory legislation that “threatens” the unions. For every pound received by the STUC in 2017, around 60p came from the SNP Government, whose policies the civic body attempts to influence.
One critic of Smith’s leadership said the STUC had offered occasional criticism of the SNP Government, such as questioning rates relief for small business.
However, Smith is a member of the First Minister’s Standing Council on Europe and he backed the SNP Government position in the row over a Brexit “power grab” of Holyrood powers. The STUC also provided a mild quote in response to the findings of the SNP Growth Commission, a report that was widely criticised by figures on the political Left.
Liberal Democrat MSP Alex Cole-Hamilton said: “The trade union movement is a vital part of public life and the defence of workers’ rights. They should always be utterly independent both of management and of Government. So to learn that the STUC gets the majority of funding from the Scottish Government puts that independence into question.
“They should be a champion for trade unions and of working people above all things, but many have been concerned that they have seemed to have pulled their punches recently over criticising the SNP Government on things like the austerity proposed by the Growth Commission.”
Scottish Tory MSP Bill Bowman said: “The STUC is curiously quiet when it comes to criticising the Scottish Government.
"Perhaps it’s a case of not biting the hand that feeds you.
“If the SNP Government is bankrolling the STUC, that explains why the organisation is so reluctant to question SNP decisions. No such problem seems to exist in relation to the UK Government.
“There’s a blatant conflict of interest here, and one which raises serious questions about the STUC’s ability to function transparently and responsibly.”
A senior trade union figure said: “This is a serious situation for the STUC. Relying on external funding from the Scottish Government not only undermines the future sustainability of the organisation, it places a significant question mark over their ability to scrutinise and challenge Scottish Government policy making.”
Separately, the STUC also faced criticism after an employment tribunal ruled that a staff member had been victimised by selecting him for redundancy.
The STUC failed to have the ruling overturned in an appeal and is in line for a hefty legal bill.
The Sunday Herald asked some of the STUC’s biggest affiliates for a comment on the tribunal case, but most did not provide a comment.
However, a spokesperson for GMB Scotland, one of the country’s biggest unions, said: “The judgment is troubling – victimisation in the workplace isn’t acceptable.
The statement added: “On numerous occasions we have raised our concerns about transparency and accountability in the running of the STUC, to defend the jobs and conditions of the staff we represent within the STUC and for the organisation’s ability to campaign effectively on behalf of all its affiliate members in future.
“GMB Scotland will continue to seek to address those concerns through the internal processes of the STUC.”
An STUC spokesperson said: “The funds received by the STUC from the Scottish Government are to fund learning and development projects run by our affiliated unions that provide learning opportunities for over 9,000 trade union members every year.
“These projects make a significant contribution to upskilling and reskilling the workforce and to our shared objective with the Scottish Government of achieving a more inclusive economy.
“The STUC is not dependent on Scottish Government funding. If this funding was not provided, thousands of low-paid, low-skilled workers would be deprived of the opportunity for personal and professional development.”
On the GMB criticism, the spokesperson said: “There are multiple opportunities available to all of our affiliates to ensure we remain transparent and accountable, principally our Annual Congress which elects and holds to account our General Council on which members of the GMB serve.
“Concerns raised by the GMB, which align with the specific issues mentioned above, have already been addressed directly with its Scottish secretary.”
SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon speaks at the STUC conference in Aviemore. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Monday April 24, 2017. Ms Sturgeon cast the general election as a straight fight between her own party and the Conservatives north of the border
THE Scottish Trades Union Congress is facing questions about its independence after the scale of its reliance on SNP Government funding was revealed.
Leaked documents show that the STUC, which speaks for nearly 500,000 workers, received around 60 per cent of its income from Nicola Sturgeon’s Government last year.
The £2.6 million in public funding far exceeds the sum paid to the STUC in fees from its own members.
Meanwhile, the GMB union, one of the umbrella group’s biggest members, said in a statement that they had raised concerns about “transparency and accountability in the running of the STUC”.
Founded in 1897, the Glasgow-based STUC acts as the voice of the trade union movement and lobbies Government for policy changes. It represents the interests of members in 39 unions and 20 trades union councils, and is financed by affiliation fees.
Although the STUC is not aligned to a political party, the body had a high-profile role promoting devolution in the 1980s and 1990s.
However, senior trade union figures told this newspaper that the STUC, led by general secretary Grahame Smith, was too reliant on the Scottish Government and had lost its way.
The STUC is now facing questions about its relationship with the Government and the financial model on which the organisation is based.
Unlike the TUC – its UK sister organisation – the STUC is under no obligation to make its annual financial statements available outwith affiliated unions.
A spin-off firm, STUC Training Ltd, publishes accounts, but a detailed picture of the income of the body is not in the public domain.
According to documents presented to the annual congress in Aviemore this year, the STUC and its training arm had a combined income of around £4.3m in 2017. Of this sum, less than 25 per cent came in the form of affiliation fees from trade unionists.
The biggest chunk of cash, £2.3m, was given to STUC Training Ltd by the SNP Government for the “Scottish Union Learning” initiative, which promotes skills and lifelong learning. Funds through the scheme are provided to the STUC, which distributes resources for different projects to help union members.
Another budget line also shows that the STUC received £324,440 from the Government for the “Union Modernisation Fund”.
This new pot was announced by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon as a way of mitigating what she described as Tory legislation that “threatens” the unions. For every pound received by the STUC in 2017, around 60p came from the SNP Government, whose policies the civic body attempts to influence.
One critic of Smith’s leadership said the STUC had offered occasional criticism of the SNP Government, such as questioning rates relief for small business.
However, Smith is a member of the First Minister’s Standing Council on Europe and he backed the SNP Government position in the row over a Brexit “power grab” of Holyrood powers. The STUC also provided a mild quote in response to the findings of the SNP Growth Commission, a report that was widely criticised by figures on the political Left.
Liberal Democrat MSP Alex Cole-Hamilton said: “The trade union movement is a vital part of public life and the defence of workers’ rights. They should always be utterly independent both of management and of Government. So to learn that the STUC gets the majority of funding from the Scottish Government puts that independence into question.
“They should be a champion for trade unions and of working people above all things, but many have been concerned that they have seemed to have pulled their punches recently over criticising the SNP Government on things like the austerity proposed by the Growth Commission.”
Scottish Tory MSP Bill Bowman said: “The STUC is curiously quiet when it comes to criticising the Scottish Government.
"Perhaps it’s a case of not biting the hand that feeds you.
“If the SNP Government is bankrolling the STUC, that explains why the organisation is so reluctant to question SNP decisions. No such problem seems to exist in relation to the UK Government.
“There’s a blatant conflict of interest here, and one which raises serious questions about the STUC’s ability to function transparently and responsibly.”
A senior trade union figure said: “This is a serious situation for the STUC. Relying on external funding from the Scottish Government not only undermines the future sustainability of the organisation, it places a significant question mark over their ability to scrutinise and challenge Scottish Government policy making.”
Separately, the STUC also faced criticism after an employment tribunal ruled that a staff member had been victimised by selecting him for redundancy.
The STUC failed to have the ruling overturned in an appeal and is in line for a hefty legal bill.
The Sunday Herald asked some of the STUC’s biggest affiliates for a comment on the tribunal case, but most did not provide a comment.
However, a spokesperson for GMB Scotland, one of the country’s biggest unions, said: “The judgment is troubling – victimisation in the workplace isn’t acceptable.
The statement added: “On numerous occasions we have raised our concerns about transparency and accountability in the running of the STUC, to defend the jobs and conditions of the staff we represent within the STUC and for the organisation’s ability to campaign effectively on behalf of all its affiliate members in future.
“GMB Scotland will continue to seek to address those concerns through the internal processes of the STUC.”
An STUC spokesperson said: “The funds received by the STUC from the Scottish Government are to fund learning and development projects run by our affiliated unions that provide learning opportunities for over 9,000 trade union members every year.
“These projects make a significant contribution to upskilling and reskilling the workforce and to our shared objective with the Scottish Government of achieving a more inclusive economy.
“The STUC is not dependent on Scottish Government funding. If this funding was not provided, thousands of low-paid, low-skilled workers would be deprived of the opportunity for personal and professional development.”
On the GMB criticism, the spokesperson said: “There are multiple opportunities available to all of our affiliates to ensure we remain transparent and accountable, principally our Annual Congress which elects and holds to account our General Council on which members of the GMB serve.
“Concerns raised by the GMB, which align with the specific issues mentioned above, have already been addressed directly with its Scottish secretary.”
