Globespan Campaign
Here's a summary of what is being said to the Employment Tribunals in Scotland - on behalf of the former Globespan claimants - who were all so shabbily treated in December 2009.
No response has been received as yet - but any further news will be reported on the blog site.
Claimant V Globespan Group plc (in administration) & Others
The Claimant was employed by the Respondents in an establishment in Scotland.
The Respondent were part of a group of companies which were associated employers controlled by the same person.
The Respondent’s financial difficulties arose from its relationship with E-Clear. The problems were known about from at least July 2009 – 5 months before it went into administration.
The Claimant was dismissed without notice and without any fair procedure being followed and without payment of her/his contractual and statutory entitlements.
The Respondents have no recognised union for the Claimants group of staff and no steps were taken by the Respondents to appoint workers representatives and no information was provided to staff and no consultation took place in accordance with the 1992 Act
The Claimant therefore claims:
1 Protective award
2 Unfair dismissal
3 Wrongful dismissal
4 Failure to pay redundancy
5 Failure to pay outstanding holiday pay
6 Failure to pay notice pay
No response has been received as yet - but any further news will be reported on the blog site.
Claimant V Globespan Group plc (in administration) & Others
The Claimant was employed by the Respondents in an establishment in Scotland.
The Respondent were part of a group of companies which were associated employers controlled by the same person.
The Respondent’s financial difficulties arose from its relationship with E-Clear. The problems were known about from at least July 2009 – 5 months before it went into administration.
The Claimant was dismissed without notice and without any fair procedure being followed and without payment of her/his contractual and statutory entitlements.
The Respondents have no recognised union for the Claimants group of staff and no steps were taken by the Respondents to appoint workers representatives and no information was provided to staff and no consultation took place in accordance with the 1992 Act
The Claimant therefore claims:
1 Protective award
2 Unfair dismissal
3 Wrongful dismissal
4 Failure to pay redundancy
5 Failure to pay outstanding holiday pay
6 Failure to pay notice pay
