First Spiteful, Then Dishonest
if Corbyn said this once or twice you could forgive the verbal stumble...now that it's more than three times it's clear that he's being dishonest
Yet Norway is in the Single Market but not in the EU.
So I think it is fair to say that the Labour leader is being completely dishonest and is trying to mislead people over what is possible.
Not only that, of course, because Jeremy Corbyn is massively out of step with the vast majority of Labour Party members who support remaining in the Single Market and the Customs Union - and having a second referendum on the final term of Brexit.
Labour's Spiteful Brexit (11/01/18)
87% of Labour Party members support continued membership of the EU Single Market and 78% of party members support a second referendum on the final Brexit terms.
Against that background Martin Kettle explains why Labour leadership is in such a mess and seems willing to cut its nose off to spite its face.
"If Jeremy Corbyn made the same case (as Blair) – which is backed by an overwhelming majority of Labour party members, research has showed – things would be very different. But he isn’t. If only the TUC’s Frances O’Grady could be persuaded to take up the mantle of spearheading the opposition to Brexit, many things would be possible.
"Please read Blair’s new article on Brexit nevertheless. His arguments are a wake-up call for the political year. As Blair says, 2018 is when real decisions must be made – about the terms, about soft or hard Brexit, and about a referendum on the final deal. The pivotal decision about Ireland – on which so much else hinges – has merely been postponed. The four options that Blair sets out for Britain – remain and reform, leave but stay in the single market and customs union, exit all structures but make a bespoke deal, and make a virtue of leaving – are the only choices facing Britain. Twelve months from now, Britain will have embarked on one of them. This matters, massively."
Read the full article via the link below to The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/04/tony-blair-brexit-labour-theresa-may
Tony Blair’s a flawed messenger – but he’s worth listening to on Brexit
The former prime minister still divides Labour, but he is making the best case on the left against Theresa May’s disastrous strategy
Tony Blair will be 65 this year. In the Britain he grew up in, that used to mean the male retirement age. Bring it on, many will say. But these once-immovable milestones no longer exist. They certainly do not apply to the former prime minister. For Blair has made it crystal clear in his new year intervention on Brexit that he has absolutely no intention of quitting the public stage any time soon.
This of course appals many people for serious reasons that do not need to be re-rehearsed here. Even those who continue to think well of him have their doubts. Blair is a permanently damaged figure. Whenever he enters the public arena, he always risks making himself, not what he says, into the issue – John Humphrys’ self-important aggression against Blair on the Today programme on Thursday showed this process at its most depressing. But there are three serious reasons why the rest of us should make the effort to focus on what he says, rather than on him.
Blair and accusations of Blairism have been cynically and very successfully exploited
The first of these is that Blair articulates the case against Theresa May’s Brexit strategy more clearly and more devastatingly than anyone else in British public life. If that is anyone’s fault, it is not Blair’s. He is putting into words things that no one else is managing to do so well, so succinctly or with such urgency. If Jeremy Corbyn made the same case – which is backed by an overwhelming majority of Labour party members, research has showed – things would be very different. But he isn’t. If only the TUC’s Frances O’Grady could be persuaded to take up the mantle of spearheading the opposition to Brexit, many things would be possible.
Please read Blair’s new article on Brexit nevertheless. His arguments are a wake-up call for the political year. As Blair says, 2018 is when real decisions must be made – about the terms, about soft or hard Brexit, and about a referendum on the final deal. The pivotal decision about Ireland – on which so much else hinges – has merely been postponed. The four options that Blair sets out for Britain – remain and reform, leave but stay in the single market and customs union, exit all structures but make a bespoke deal, and make a virtue of leaving – are the only choices facing Britain. Twelve months from now, Britain will have embarked on one of them. This matters, massively.
Blair accepts that securing continued EU membership involves a task of persuasion and good timing. Gordon Brown said much the same a few weeks ago. But the trigger for this particular article is his frustration with the Labour party for its caution and equivocation on Brexit. Though Blair does not mention Corbyn by name, he is explicitly critical of Labour for having its own cake-and-eat-it strategy. The final few paragraphs in particular read like a primer from Blair to Corbyn on how to move beyond that.
As so often, Blair can give the impression that a highly ambitious political goal is achievable by an effort of will, his own leadership skills and by well-honed political messaging. This over-optimism has always been one of his faults. Read his article closely, however, and it is actually more equivocal about the options than it may appear. Blair keeps his views open on a second referendum. And he comes close to saying that the ultimate test of policy is about single-market membership – in other words a soft Brexit rather than no Brexit at all. This puts him quite close to the current stance of Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer.
There is a second reason why the new year is a good moment to be more open to what Blair and those like him are saying. Britain faces several domestic political crises at the start of 2018, all of them made worse by Brexit. Labour is within sight of winning power, but still some way off. Its chances will depend in significant part on how it behaves as a party between now and what may be a distant election, and upon its ability to persuade those who were unpersuaded in June 2017. That means a clear programme, credibility and party unity are paramount.
This in turn means showing that Labour can be a tolerant coalition of traditions and ideas. There is much more to this than bringing a wider group of talent into the shadow cabinet. Labour needs to prove, from top to bottom, that its left respects its right and that its right respects its left. That wasn’t so in much of Blair’s time – with eventual dire consequences – and at times there is not much evidence of it in Corbyn’s either. But the current armistice is better than a civil war. The longer it holds, the better.
"If Jeremy Corbyn made the same case (as Blair) – which is backed by an overwhelming majority of Labour party members, research has showed – things would be very different. But he isn’t. If only the TUC’s Frances O’Grady could be persuaded to take up the mantle of spearheading the opposition to Brexit, many things would be possible.
"Please read Blair’s new article on Brexit nevertheless. His arguments are a wake-up call for the political year. As Blair says, 2018 is when real decisions must be made – about the terms, about soft or hard Brexit, and about a referendum on the final deal. The pivotal decision about Ireland – on which so much else hinges – has merely been postponed. The four options that Blair sets out for Britain – remain and reform, leave but stay in the single market and customs union, exit all structures but make a bespoke deal, and make a virtue of leaving – are the only choices facing Britain. Twelve months from now, Britain will have embarked on one of them. This matters, massively."
Read the full article via the link below to The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/04/tony-blair-brexit-labour-theresa-may
Tony Blair’s a flawed messenger – but he’s worth listening to on Brexit
By Martin Kettle - The Guardian
The former prime minister still divides Labour, but he is making the best case on the left against Theresa May’s disastrous strategy
Tony Blair will be 65 this year. In the Britain he grew up in, that used to mean the male retirement age. Bring it on, many will say. But these once-immovable milestones no longer exist. They certainly do not apply to the former prime minister. For Blair has made it crystal clear in his new year intervention on Brexit that he has absolutely no intention of quitting the public stage any time soon.
This of course appals many people for serious reasons that do not need to be re-rehearsed here. Even those who continue to think well of him have their doubts. Blair is a permanently damaged figure. Whenever he enters the public arena, he always risks making himself, not what he says, into the issue – John Humphrys’ self-important aggression against Blair on the Today programme on Thursday showed this process at its most depressing. But there are three serious reasons why the rest of us should make the effort to focus on what he says, rather than on him.
Blair and accusations of Blairism have been cynically and very successfully exploited
The first of these is that Blair articulates the case against Theresa May’s Brexit strategy more clearly and more devastatingly than anyone else in British public life. If that is anyone’s fault, it is not Blair’s. He is putting into words things that no one else is managing to do so well, so succinctly or with such urgency. If Jeremy Corbyn made the same case – which is backed by an overwhelming majority of Labour party members, research has showed – things would be very different. But he isn’t. If only the TUC’s Frances O’Grady could be persuaded to take up the mantle of spearheading the opposition to Brexit, many things would be possible.
Please read Blair’s new article on Brexit nevertheless. His arguments are a wake-up call for the political year. As Blair says, 2018 is when real decisions must be made – about the terms, about soft or hard Brexit, and about a referendum on the final deal. The pivotal decision about Ireland – on which so much else hinges – has merely been postponed. The four options that Blair sets out for Britain – remain and reform, leave but stay in the single market and customs union, exit all structures but make a bespoke deal, and make a virtue of leaving – are the only choices facing Britain. Twelve months from now, Britain will have embarked on one of them. This matters, massively.
Blair accepts that securing continued EU membership involves a task of persuasion and good timing. Gordon Brown said much the same a few weeks ago. But the trigger for this particular article is his frustration with the Labour party for its caution and equivocation on Brexit. Though Blair does not mention Corbyn by name, he is explicitly critical of Labour for having its own cake-and-eat-it strategy. The final few paragraphs in particular read like a primer from Blair to Corbyn on how to move beyond that.
As so often, Blair can give the impression that a highly ambitious political goal is achievable by an effort of will, his own leadership skills and by well-honed political messaging. This over-optimism has always been one of his faults. Read his article closely, however, and it is actually more equivocal about the options than it may appear. Blair keeps his views open on a second referendum. And he comes close to saying that the ultimate test of policy is about single-market membership – in other words a soft Brexit rather than no Brexit at all. This puts him quite close to the current stance of Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer.
There is a second reason why the new year is a good moment to be more open to what Blair and those like him are saying. Britain faces several domestic political crises at the start of 2018, all of them made worse by Brexit. Labour is within sight of winning power, but still some way off. Its chances will depend in significant part on how it behaves as a party between now and what may be a distant election, and upon its ability to persuade those who were unpersuaded in June 2017. That means a clear programme, credibility and party unity are paramount.
This in turn means showing that Labour can be a tolerant coalition of traditions and ideas. There is much more to this than bringing a wider group of talent into the shadow cabinet. Labour needs to prove, from top to bottom, that its left respects its right and that its right respects its left. That wasn’t so in much of Blair’s time – with eventual dire consequences – and at times there is not much evidence of it in Corbyn’s either. But the current armistice is better than a civil war. The longer it holds, the better.
