Words of War
A war of words is underway about whether the UK should participate in the bombing campaign against the mad dogs of the Islamic State in their safe havens in Syria. In Raqqa, for example, where 'Jihadi John' was taken out in a targeted strike from an American drone missile. Now people like Jeremy Corbyn say that it would have been ' far better' if Mohammed Emwazi (aka Jihadi John) had been captured and put on trial for his cowardly, murderous crimes, but this would have put the lives of UK or Nato troops at risk. Not only that, of course, because people like Jeremy Corbyn and his friends in the Stop the War (STW) Coalition would then have complained that western troops were acting unlawfully by taking military action in another country (Syria) without the permission of the Syrian Government. In my view the arguments about extending military action into Syria are finely balanced - there are no guarantees of success of success and there are obvious risks one way...